Presencia de buenas prácticas de humanización en la atención a los pacientes con enfermedades raras en los servicios de farmacia / Presence of good humanization practices in the healthcare of patients with rare diseases in Pharmacy Services

Objetivo analizar la presencia de buenas prácticas de humanización en la atención a los pacientes con enfermedades raras en los servicios de farmacia hospitalaria para identificar las fortalezas y las áreas prevalentes de mejora para una atención más humanizada. Métodos se elaboró un cuestionario online empleando Google Form® estructurado en 2 partes: la primera recogía datos identificativos y la segunda incluía las preguntas relacionadas con el cumplimiento de los 61 estándares del Manual de buenas prácticas de humanización en la atención a pacientes con enfermedades raras en los servicios de farmacia hospitalaria. El acceso al cuestionario se envió por correo electrónico a los jefes de servicio de farmacia hospitalaria de 18 hospitales. El periodo de estudio fue de octubre 2021 a octubre 2022. Las variables analizadas fueron el número de criterios cumplidos, el cumplimiento total (porcentaje de criterios cumplidos) tanto por línea estratégica como por tipo o nivel de estándar (básico, básico de obligado cumplimiento, avanzado o excelente), de forma global y agrupados por comunidades autónomas. Resultados el estudio incluyó 18 servicios de farmacia hospitalaria. La media global de estándares cumplidos fue de 31,1 (IC 95%: 24,8–37,6) y el cumplimiento total medio del 52,1% (IC 95%: 44,4–59,7). La línea 1, Cultura de humanización, tuvo un cumplimiento medio del 46,5% (IC 95%: 35,3–57,7), la línea 2, Empoderamiento del paciente, del 47,4% (IC 95%: 37,1–57,8), la línea 3, Cuidado del profesional, del 49,7% (IC 95%: 39,8–59,1), la línea 4, Espacios físicos y confort del 55,6% (IC 95%: 46,3–64,8) y la línea 5, Organización de la atención, del 63,8% (IC 95%: 55,8–71,9). Conclusión el cumplimiento medio de los estándares está entre 40 y 60%, lo que indica que la humanización está presente en los servicios de farmacia hospitalaria, pero existe un amplio margen de mejora (AU)

Objective To analyze the presence of Good Humanization Practices in the care of patients with rare diseases in Hospital Pharmacy Services and to identify the strengths and prevalent areas for improvement in the humanization of healthcare. Methods Online questionnaire structured in two parts was developed using Google Form®. The first one was designed to collect identifying data and the second one included questions related to compliance with the 61 standards of the Manual of Good Humanization Practices in the healthcare of patients with rare diseases in Hospital Pharmacy Services. Access to the questionnaire was sent by email to the Heads of the Hospital Pharmacy Service of 18 hospitals. The study period was from October 2021 to October 2022. The analyzed variables were the number of criteria that were considered met, total compliance (percentage of criteria met), by strategic line and by type or level of standard, globally and grouped by regions of Spain. Results 18 Hospital Pharmacy Services were included. The overall mean of standards met was 31.1 (95% CI: 24.8–37.6) and mean total compliance was 52.1% (95% CI: 44.4–59.7). The mean compliance by strategic line was line 1 Humanization culture: 46.5% (95% CI: 35.3–57.7), line 2 Patient empowerment: 47.4% (95% CI: 37.1– 57.8), line 3 Professional care: 49.7% (95% CI: 39.8–59.1), line 4 Physical spaces and comfort: 55.6% (95% CI: 46.3–64.8) and line 5 Organization of healthcare: 63.8% (95% CI: 55.8–71.9). Conclusion The average compliance with the standards is between 40 and 60%, which indicates that humanization is present in the Hospital Pharmacy Services, but there is a wide margin for improvement. The main strength in the humanization of Hospital Pharmacy Services is a patient-centered care organization, and the area with the greatest room for improvement is the culture of humanization (AU)

Presence of good humanization practices in the healthcare of patients with rare diseases in Pharmacy Services. / Presencia de buenas prácticas de humanización en la atención a los pacientes con enfermedades raras en los servicios de farmacia.

OBJECTIVE: To analyze the presence of Good Humanization Practices in the care of patients with rare diseases in Hospital Pharmacy Services and to identify the strengths and prevalent areas for improvement in the humanization of healthcare. METHODS: Online questionnaire structured in two parts was developed using Google Form®. The first one was designed to collect identifying data and the second one included questions related to compliance with the 61 standards of the Manual of Good Humanization Practices in the healthcare of patients with rare diseases in Hospital Pharmacy Services. Access to the questionnaire was sent by email to the Heads of the Hospital Pharmacy Service of 18 hospitals. The study period was from October 2021 to October 2022. The analyzed variables were the number of criteria that were considered met, total compliance (percentage of criteria met), by strategic line and by type or level of standard, globally and grouped by regions of Spain. RESULTS: 18 Hospital Pharmacy Services were included. The overall mean of standards met was 31.1 (95% CI: 24.8-37.6) and mean total compliance was 52.1% (95% CI: 44.4-59.7). The mean compliance by strategic line was line 1 Humanization culture: 46.5% (95% CI: 35.3-57.7), line 2 Patient empowerment: 47.4% (95% CI: 37.1- 57.8), line 3 Professional care: 49.7% (95% CI: 39.8-59.1), line 4 Physical spaces and comfort: 55.6% (95% CI: 46.3-64.8) and line 5 Organization of healthcare: 63.8% (95% CI: 55.8-71.9). CONCLUSION: The average compliance with the standards is between 40 and 60%, which indicates that humanization is present in the Hospital Pharmacy Services, but there is a wide margin for improvement. The main strength in the humanization of Hospital Pharmacy Services is a patient-centered care organization, and the area with the greatest room for improvement is the culture of humanization.

Implantación y resultados de un programa de riesgo compartido para terapias de sustitución enzimática en enfermedades de depósito lisosomal / Implementation and results of a risk-sharing scheme for enzyme replacement therapy in lysosomal storage disease

Objetivo: Describir la implantación y los resultados de un programa de riesgo compartido para el tratamiento enzimático sustitutivo de enfermedades lisosomales. Método: Se diseñó y aplicó el programa en un hospital de referencia para enfermedades congénitas del metabolismo. La consecución de los acuerdos requirió las siguientes fases: 1) Definir y consensuar las variables y criterios de respuesta al tratamiento; 2) asignar el porcentaje de descuento a cada escalón de efectividad; 3) elaborar y firmar el acuerdo por todas las partes; 4) implantar el acuerdo; 5) individualizar la gestión de compras; 6) evaluar los resultados clínicos, y 7) emitir un informe anual. Resultados: Se incluyeron ocho pacientes en el programa (cuatro con enfermedad de Hurler, dos con enfermedad de Pompe y dos con enfermedad de Gaucher), siendo cinco de ellos mujeres y tres varones. Tras analizar las variables y criterios de respuesta definidos, todos los pacientes presentaron efectividad plena tras dos o tres años de seguimiento, excepto uno de ellos que no se pudo evaluar. Dada la efectividad alcanzada, el hospital realizó el pago íntegro de todos los tratamientos administrados. Conclusiones: El programa de riesgo compartido implantado es la primera experiencia publicada de pago por resultados clínicos en medicamentos huérfanos en España. El impacto económico ha sido limitado y la implantación del programa no ha estado exenta de complejidad de formulación y de gestión. Sin embargo, el mayor logro ha sido reducir la brecha de conocimiento entre eficacia y efectividad, constatando que las terapias administradas han mostrado los beneficios óptimos por los que está dispuesto a pagar el financiador

Objective: To describe a risk-sharing program's implementation and results on enzyme replacement therapy for lysosomal diseases. Method: The program was designed and implemented in a referral hospital for congenital metabolic diseases. The conclusion of agreements required the following phases: 1) To define and agree on response variables and criteria to treatment; 2) to assign discount percentage to each stage of effectiveness; 3) to prepare and sign the agreement by all parties; 4) to implement the agreement; 5) to individualize purchases management; 6) to evaluate clinical results, and 7) to issue an annual report. Results: Eight patients were included in the program (four with Hurler's disease, two with Pompe and two with Gaucher), five of them were women and three were men. After analyzing the defined variables and response criteria, all patients presented full effectiveness after two or three years of follow-up except one of them that could not be evaluated. Given the effectiveness achieved, the hospital made full payment of all administered therapies. Conclusions: The implanted risk-sharing program is Spain's first published event of paying for clinical results using orphan drugs. Economic impact has been limited, and program implementation has gone through a complex process of formulation and management. However, the greatest achievement has been to reduce the knowledge gap between efficacy and effectiveness, stating that the therapies administered have shown the optimal benefits for which the funder is willing to pay

Implementation and results of a risk-sharing scheme for enzyme replacement therapy in lysosomal storage diseases.

OBJECTIVE: To describe a risk-sharing program's implementation and  results on enzyme replacement therapy for lysosomal diseases. METHOD: The program was designed and implemented in a referral hospital for congenital metabolic diseases. The conclusion of  agreements required the following phases: 1) To define and agree on  response variables and criteria to treatment; 2) to assign discount  percentage to each stage of effectiveness; 3) to prepare and sign the  agreement by all parties; 4) to implement the agreement; 5) to  individualize purchases management; 6) to evaluate clinical results, and  7) to issue an annual report. RESULTS: Eight patients were included in the program (four with Hurler's disease, two with Pompe and two with Gaucher), five of them  were women and three were men. After analyzing the defined variables  and response criteria, all patients presented full effectiveness after two  or three years of follow-up except one of them that could not be  evaluated. Given the effectiveness achieved, the hospital made full  payment of all administered therapies. CONCLUSIONS: The implanted risk-sharing program is Spain's first  published event of paying for clinical results using orphan drugs.  Economic impact has been limited, and program implementation has  gone through a complex process of formulation and management.  However, the greatest achievement has been to reduce the knowledge  gap between efficacy and effectiveness, stating that the therapies  administered have shown the optimal benefits for which the funder is  willing to pay.

Objetivo: Describir la implantación y los resultados de un programa de riesgo compartido para el tratamiento enzimático sustitutivo de  enfermedades lisosomales.Método: Se diseñó y aplicó el programa en un hospital de referencia para enfermedades congénitas del metabolismo. La  consecución de los acuerdos requirió las siguientes fases: 1) Definir y  consensuar las variables y criterios de respuesta al tratamiento; 2)  asignar el porcentaje de descuento a cada escalón de efectividad; 3)  elaborar y firmar el acuerdo por todas las partes; 4) implantar el  acuerdo; 5) individualizar la gestión de compras; 6) evaluar los  resultados clínicos, y 7) emitir un informe anual.Resultados: Se incluyeron ocho pacientes en el programa (cuatro con enfermedad de Hurler, dos con enfermedad de Pompe y dos con  enfermedad de Gaucher), siendo cinco de ellos mujeres y tres varones.  Tras analizar las variables y criterios de respuesta definidos, todos los  pacientes presentaron efectividad plena tras dos o tres años de  seguimiento, excepto uno de ellos que no se pudo evaluar. Dada la  efectividad alcanzada, el hospital realizó el pago íntegro de todos los  tratamientos administrados.Conclusiones: El programa de riesgo compartido implantado es la primera experiencia publicada de pago por resultados clínicos en  medicamentos huérfanos en España. El impacto económico ha sido  limitado y la implantación del programa no ha estado exenta de  complejidad de formulación y de gestión. Sin embargo, el mayor logro  ha sido reducir la brecha de conocimiento entre eficacia y efectividad,  constatando que las terapias administradas han mostrado los beneficios  óptimos por los que está dispuesto a pagar el financiador.

Impact of adherence on subcutaneous interferon beta-1a effectiveness administered by Rebismart® in patients with multiple sclerosis.

BACKGROUND: Adherence to disease-modifying drugs (DMDs) is one of the key factors for achieving optimal clinical outcomes. Rebismart® is an injection device for subcutaneous administration of interferon beta-1a (INF ß-1a) that is also able to monitor adherence objectively. The aim of this study was to describe adherence to INF ß-1a using the said electronic autoinjection device and to explore the relationship between adherence and relapses in a Spanish cohort. METHODS: This is a retrospective observational study in which 110 Spanish patients self-administered INF ß-1a subcutaneously using an electronic autoinjection device between June 2010 and June 2015. The primary end point was the percentage of adherence measured by Rebismart® to subcutaneous INF ß-1a injections calculated as number of injections received in time period versus number of injections scheduled in time period. Other variables recorded were demographic and clinical data. Statistical analysis was performed using SPSS 19.0 software. RESULTS: Median adherence for the total study period was 96.5% (interquartile range [IQR]: 91.1-99.1). Similar values were observed during the first 6 months: 98.7% (IQR: 91.3-100), and the last 6 months: 97.6% (IQR: 91.1-99.8). Median duration of treatment was 979 days (IQR: 613.8-1,266.8). During the entire treatment period, 77.3% of patients were relapse free and mean annualized relapse rate was 0.14 (standard deviation: 0.33). Increased adherence was associated with better clinical outcomes, leading to lower relapse risk (odds ratio: 0.953; 95% confidence interval: 0.912-0.995). Specifically, every percentage unit increase in adherence resulted in a 4.7% decrease in relapse. CONCLUSION: Patients with multiple sclerosis who self-injected INF ß-1a with Rebismart® had excellent adherence, correlating with a high proportion of relapse-free patients and very low annualized relapse rate.